The idea of an uncharted territory within the universe of contemporary cultural production is not so much a geographical or institutional reality as it is a psychological projection necessary for the survival of the myth of authenticity.
The narrative of the artist or curator operating in a vacuum, free from the constraints of the market and the logic of blue chip galleries, bears a strong resemblance to the figure of the Romantic wanderer, with the difference that today the landscape is not sublime but saturated with digital and bureaucratic signals.
We tend to believe that the system is a monolithic entity, a building with barred doors, whereas it is better understood as a fluid that occupies every available space, making the concept of an outside an ontological paradox even before it becomes a professional one. The saturation of the main actors within established hierarchies has generated a centrifugal pressure that pushes new protagonists toward territories that appear deserted. This exodus, however, never takes place in isolation. The individual who defines themselves as an outsider carries with them, often unconsciously, the entire apparatus of codes and languages they attempted to reject.
No creative or critical act can be defined as such without a relation, without an interface that translates it into value, whether symbolic or economic. The desire for autonomy inevitably clashes with the need for recognition. Art does not occur unless it is acknowledged within a system of relations, even if that system consists of a small circle of defectors.
Exploring the possibility of a career outside official channels therefore means questioning the very nature of cultural power and its capacity to regenerate itself through its opponents. Those who attempt to dismantle the system or ignore it only trace the boundaries of a new organism, a shadow system that reproduces, with a certain ironic fidelity, the dynamics of exclusion and hierarchy of the original one.
The real question is not whether it is possible to live outside the system, but how long it will take for what we call the outside to become the new inside, solid and inaccessible to those who come after. In this perspective, the role of the artist, curator, or more generally the cultural professional is transformed, in order to remain active within the system, into a primarily relational function, where the ability to create new forms of validation becomes the main currency of exchange.
We discover that the system is not a prison to escape from, but the very language through which we give shape to aesthetic experience. Changing the system ultimately means changing vocabulary, but never abandoning the syntax of social recognition that makes a work public.
CORE · Members
Continue reading
This essay is part of CORE. Membership opens it in full, with every CORE essay, the Hypercast library and the Fakewhale AI Curator.
