In recent years, artificial intelligence has taken a central place in artistic and cultural debate, not so much for what it produces, but for what it represents. It has been read as a threshold, a rupture, a promise, or a threat. In this initial phase, AI functioned primarily as a symbolic device, a condenser of narratives reflecting collective anxieties, technological expectations, and unresolved tensions surrounding the role of the human in creative processes.
Today, however, this symbolic centrality is gradually eroding. Artificial intelligence is no longer an exception to be foregrounded, but a pervasive presence integrated into the flows of cultural production. In the contemporary art world, AI is ceasing to be a topic and becoming an operational condition, an environmental element that structures practices, temporalities, and modes of work without necessarily announcing itself.
This shift marks a crucial transition, from AI as an ideological event to AI as an everyday medium. This does not imply a neutralization of its impact, but rather its normalization. When technology loses its spectacular character, it becomes possible to observe its cultural, political, and symbolic effects with greater clarity.
This article examines this transition by questioning how artificial intelligence is reshaping the role of the artist, authorship, and institutions, ultimately challenging the very need to assign explicit meaning to the use of technology. The question is no longer what AI means for art, but what kind of art becomes possible in a world where AI is already part of the environment.
CORE · Members
Continue reading
This essay is part of CORE. Membership opens it in full, with every CORE essay, the Hypercast library and the Fakewhale AI Curator.
